I don't understand. If there are no laws in CT prohibiting feeding wildlife why is it the right thing for Four Ten to stop hunting a good spot. Why does she have "priority" over what Four Ten was doing. If she is feeding the deer (not illegal) and no feeder and he harvests a deer because the deer like the property due to being fed whats the issue. Someone who sees wildlife as their pets has priority over a hunter who sees wildlife as game??

With all due respect to EnCon your response makes me feel like the hunters are just lower and lower on the totem pole of society. In most situations we appear to be viewed and treated as guilty until proven innocent. We all need to be careful and pussy foot around the non-hunters so as to not upset them. Its ok for them to upset us and we constantly need to be the guarded ones almost as if we are doing something wrong because of society's view of someone in camo legally harvesting game.
And no I"m not advocating starting something intentionally with someone in the woods but if I am hunting a piece of property legally and someone else has permission to walk the property and wants to feed the animals I should defer to the person feeding the animals? What happened to my rights? I really don't understand.

Maybe I've taken your (EnCons) response out of context but I would appreciate an explanation or clarification.